Observation
Different teams doing things slightly differently, inconsistent inputs, unclear ownership, and then AI gets introduced on top of that. I'm seeing this come up repeatedly.
From the Field
I worked with a team looking to introduce AI into their HR processes. On the surface, it made sense, automate parts of the workflow, improve response times, reduce manual effort. But when we looked closer, even basic things like how absence was recorded and managed varied across teams. Different naming, different steps, different expectations. At that point, the AI wasn't the challenge. The process was.
Why This Matters
AI doesn't fix inconsistency. It scales it. If the inputs, rules, and structure aren't aligned, you don't get efficiency. You get inconsistent outputs, just faster.
Field Takeaway
If the process isn't stable without AI, it won't be stable with it.
Subscriptions open · New editions as published
THE MONTHLY FIELD NOTE
No noise. Just the useful bits.